Grade Distributions New Tool for Equality

Source: Allison Silverman

One of the sheets of grade distributions

Allison Silverman

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

At recent Shared Decision Making Site Council (SDMSC) meetings, members discussed grade distributions by teacher and class, in order to better understand how students’ experiences at M-A differ based on their race or teachers.

Gathered in the staff lounge, teachers initially expressed hesitance. At first blush, the purpose of releasing grade distributions, especially with the names of the teachers included, remained unclear. “I’m not sure what the overall point is,” said science teacher Jeffery Decurtins, echoing the questions of others. “If letter grades matter, people are really being blown around by the wind.”

Principal Matthew Zito responded that he was beginning a conversation about “equality of experience” at M-A. The goal: a “basic level of quality and goodness”.

He described similar students from the same families who came to M-A and had completely different experiences. Moreover, while the school makes sure both honors and lower level classes receive adequate teachers, “150 kids” in each grade who are in between “historically get leftovers”.

Students felt they were “rolling their dice” if not enrolled in honors classes, especially in 9th and 10th grade, while “some parents felt their kids were screwed,” he said.

Two weeks later, at the next meeting, new grade distributions were brought to the table revealing the discrepancies between white and Hispanic students. The data showed the overall fail rates for Hispanic students to be higher than for white students in the same classes, with Hispanic males’ fail rates higher than those of Hispanic females. In some cases, the differences between races reached as high as 20%. Of course these patterns do not apply to all students, but they do provide evidence for previously-known trends.

“I feel like there are two very very separate issues we’re discussing here; one is about the distribution of grades and equity based on teachers… [the other is] about there being an achievement gap,” said student representative Tyler Finn, explaining the dual purpose the data could serve. “There is a massive gap.”

With talk of decreasing bias, the idea of evening grades seems on the table. Still, requiring teachers to have a certain number of As, of Bs, and so on remains controversial, and was talked of only obliquely. “Last time I felt there was a lot of [talk of] discrepancies between As and Bs… but I feel like there [are] some glaring fail rates” that should be accounted for, commented English teacher John Giambruno.

In terms of working to close the achievement gap, “it’s not treating everybody exactly the same, because they aren’t,” said English teacher Valerie Caveney. “They didn’t have somebody at home helping them.”

Council members threw around other ideas about the best way to start a conversation about the data outside of SDMSC. “I like the idea of curriculum groups,” said Vice Principal Karl Loosekoot. These groups, separate from standard department meetings, would function as forums for teachers teaching the same classes to discuss their respective curricula.

Throughout, concerns about the level of authority that should be given to the data surfaced. Some of the data was deemed “invalid” because of the small sample size of students in the classes. History teacher Benjamin Wellington brought up the intelligence of the students themselves, describing how varying class makeups can skew grades up or down.

However, despite potential flaws, the data can still be useful. These grade distributions are merely another tool that can be used to find a new way to look at a pervasive, multifacted problem. It is customary to review such distributions every three years, but not to the extent that they have been reviewed this semester.

In the search for equality in education, new information is always welcome; hopefully, discussion of grade distributions will be able to help move a tough conversation forward.

Print Friendly

Facebook Comments


4 Responses to “Grade Distributions New Tool for Equality”

  1. egrose on February 28th, 2013 7:01 pm

    I agree that there are huge discrepancies in the levels of difficulties of different teachers teaching the same courses. While teaching style of course varies with each individual teacher, often times differences in teaching makes what should be identical courses seem like different courses at completely different levels. While analyzing grades may not be the best way of measuring this discrepancy, I agree that it will be a useful tool in helping combat this dilemma.

  2. Nolan Martin on March 1st, 2013 2:54 am

    Though we’re always told that letter grades shouldn’t be so dear to our hearts, colleges have yet to say anything of the sort. The gap between students at vastly different achievement rates is what makes M-A such a fascinating school to attend; while I’d love to be able to see that gap shrink, I certainly do not think that creating quota’s for A’s and B’s per teacher is by any means a good way to do so. Zito has discussed toning down AP courses, claiming that not every student needs to be getting 4’s or 5’s on the exams. I simply feel that toning down education is not a way to improve it; freshman year for much of M-A’s populace was a period of waiting where our education was put on hold to allow others to catch up. If I were to be subjected to four years of that, I would probably go postal. Perhaps the most glaring issue is Government at the moment; students struggle to pass Florio’s section while not as many struggle in Martinelli. Meanwhile, Martinelli announced to her students in regards to grading the Gov paper, “I take into account which English class you’re in.” She openly admitted that even within a class there already are double standards to make things easier for struggling students. Close as the issue of the restrooms is to my heart, it’s time M-A focused on living up to its motto of “Strength in Diversity.”

  3. Hannah Ellefritz on March 4th, 2013 12:19 am

    Of course, different teachers of the same course teach the material differently. As a senior, I have definitely seen (and experienced) distress over the years as some of us get the “harder” teacher. Grade analysis is an interesting technique. Not sure where this is going to go, but I also think, as Ms. Caveney mentioned, each student is different and the random distribution of students could genuinely result in less capable students in the supposed “harder class.” Interesting.

  4. Evan on March 6th, 2013 9:03 pm

    I would agree that some classes are harder then others, yet are technically the same on transcript. It’s a bummer to think a student that supposedly thought they were in a difficulty they had selected, could actually be a harder or easier level.

Grade Distributions New Tool for Equality