Opinion: U.S. Education, Problem Solved

The American public school system's current "spiral method," doesn't let its students make a great deal of progress, making them unable to compete effectively in the international education playing field.
Drawn by: Margaret Ringler
American schools rank twenty-fifth of the OECD countries in math, behind nations including Estonia, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic. How is it that the United States can have the world’s highest GDP and GNP yet her education system is sub-par on an international scale? According to Eric Hanushek, a fellow at the Stanford Hoover Institute, “middle school does not provide the skills necessary to succeed in high-school.”
Hanushek believes that “we don’t get as much out of high school and college” because during high school, the American education system continues to establish the base amount of information that should have been learned during middle school. Hanushek insists that because Americans are not getting the degree of specialization they need in high school, they are “not competitive internationally.”
The issue at hand is the fact that the spiral education method, or the gradual establishment of general knowledge, is not limited to middle school and is spilling into high school. In order to avoid the continuation of spiral education, some charter schools and nearly all magnet schools encourage specialized education at the high school level by focusing primarily on either the humanities or the sciences.
As Hanushek remarks, charter and magnet schools also encourage parent and student involvement, which increases teacher accountability and quality. As do many private schools, charter and magnet schools give families an active say in the curriculum, forcing teachers to respond to student needs. Charter and magnet schools’ pro-active student teacher bodies fit Hanushek’s belief that “the number one mission is improving teacher quality”. However, he says, “We cannot just wave our hands and have better teachers.” Therefore, Hanushek encourages parent involvement in charter and magnet schools in order to improve American education.
Internationally, the top school systems focus either on intense student competition (as in Shanghai) or absolute student self-motivation (Finland). However, America’s spiral education system falls under neither of these categories. Whereas Shanghai schools motivate students by channeling cultural and familial pressures, and Finnish schools exempt students from external standards, schools in America often rely too greatly on a system of standardized testing, without cultivating either internal or cultural motivation to excel.
Hanushek holds the American education system’s emphasis on standardized tests, such as the high school exit exam, accountable for our failing to create either of these educational environments. Once again, charter schools fix this problem as they are exempt from state educational requirements and can have the freedom to specialize and go in depth on certain subjects without the constraint of teaching to state standards.
Hanushek also sheds light upon the fact that the intensity of student rivalry in East Asia can lead to an overabundance of competition to the point of being detrimental. Therefore, we propose following the Finnish example, in which the self-motivation of the individual students is encouraged and students are implored to learn from one another.
Finland, following this model of self-motivation and cooperative learning, ranks as the world’s number one country in terms of education. Magnet schools would steer America towards following the Finnish model, aside from the fact that they are still required to follow state standards. Therefore, we propose to apply the state standard exemption we see in charter schools to magnet schools in order for American education to once again to be internationally competitive.
“As it stands a third of State college students are taking remedial courses, the content of which is intended for high school,” says Hanushek. In order to ensure that high school and college students get the specialization they need in order to remain competitive internationally, we propose that the spiral education system remain confined to middle school.
To guarantee specialization in high school, we must combine an exemption from state standards and the promotion of teacher quality that are common in charter schools with the emphasis on student self-motivation of magnet schools.




Very interesting article, however I do not understand how, after encouraging parent involvement in American education because it causes teachers to take each student’s needs into consideration and thus improves educational quality, you can jump to stating that every student should be schooled in the Finnish method. You say that parent involvement forces teachers to react to student needs, yet the Finnish method of self motivation may not be what every student needs.
Reply
Could you elaborate on what the Finnish “self motivation” system is? How do they encourage students to motivate themselves?
Reply
very interesting article, and great illustration!
Reply
Svitale mentions that the Finnish method may not be what most students need, but as shown by OECD studies and others (google it) Finland leads Europe / most developed nations in education, there is no reason to assume that the same system would not work in the US, since the success of a certain education system rests primarily on the culture/society/economic situation of the countries which are similar in Finland and the US. Obviously one system doesn’t fit everyone, but there can be variation within the system.
@Margaret, the reason why there is not a lengthy explanation on how the Finnish motivation system works is: the Finnish system lacks mechanisms to force motivation, simple as that, there is no complex recipe and mixture of tests/pressure etc.
Reply
Svitale, The Finnish self motivation method takes into account the fact that individual students have different needs in terms of achieving academic success by encouraging peer-initiated learning. By encouraging students to be independently motivated by learning, the Finnish system caters to all kinds of students. For example, most students will develop assertive perspectives in regard to education and take the reigns themselves in order to achieve success. A result of this encouragement of self-motivation is that students who struggle more in school and need an individualized learning environment will receive the extra help they need from their peers. Peer learning as a result of self motivation thus allows for those who learn quickly to motivate themselves and learn the valuable skill of teaching, in turn educating those students who learn differently.
Reply
A tangential theory to this specialization suggests that we should focus the early years (probably through elementary school, if not part of middle school) exclusively on the study of English, as studies have shown that in our developmental years, we are most capable of absorbing vocabulary and nuances of grammar that have to be memorized. After establishing a solid grasp on the language, we can then branch out to topics of our choosing, like math, which are easier to understand conceptually when we acquire more critical thinking skills (usually around late middle school to early high school).
Reply
I still feel like the Finnish system wouldn’t work so well in America. Or maybe that’s just because I observe many lazy students on a regular basis and they don’t seem the least bit motivated to do anything. Still, a very informative, interesting opinion piece!
Reply
a very interesting point you made in this article! well written!
Reply
An interesting perspective on a very complex issue. Good work, Jacob & Joseph.
Reply
good research guys…interesting conversation…people tend to crtitique the product too heavily and don’t focus enough attentio non the process
Reply